When do conflicting parties share political power?

Link:
Autor/in:
Erscheinungsjahr:
2015
Medientyp:
Text
Schlagworte:
  • Cooperation
  • Public goods
  • Trust game
  • Agents
  • Game Theory
  • Models
  • Constitutional design
  • endogenous institutions
  • Cooperation
  • Public goods
  • Trust game
  • Agents
  • Game Theory
  • Models
Beschreibung:
  • We conduct a laboratory experiment to study the incentives of a privileged group (the "yellows") to share political power with another group (the "blues"). The yellows collectively choose the voting rule for a general election: a simple-majority rule that favors them, or a proportional rule. In two treatments, the blues can use a costly punishment option. We find that the yellows share power voluntarily only to a small extent, but they are more inclined to do so under the threat of punishment, despite the fact that punishments are not sub-game perfect. The blue group conditions punishments both on the voting rule and the electoral outcome.
  • We conduct a laboratory experiment to study the incentives of a privileged group (the "yellows") to share political power with another group (the "blues"). The yellows collectively choose the voting rule for a general election: a simple-majority rule that favors them, or a proportional rule. In two treatments, the blues can use a costly punishment option. We find that the yellows share power voluntarily only to a small extent, but they are more inclined to do so under the threat of punishment, despite the fact that punishments are not sub-game perfect. The blue group conditions punishments both on the voting rule and the electoral outcome.
Lizenz:
  • info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
Quellsystem:
Forschungsinformationssystem der UHH

Interne Metadaten
Quelldatensatz
oai:www.edit.fis.uni-hamburg.de:publications/0aaf2568-e1de-4cb5-b48e-022a4cf455a9