We tackle the tasks of automatically identifying comparative sentences and categorizing the intended preference (e.g., ``Python has better NLP libraries than MATLAB'' → Python, better, MATLAB). To this end, we manually annotate 7,199 sentences for 217 distinct target item pairs from several domains (27% of the sentences contain an oriented comparison in the sense of ``better'' or ``worse''). A gradient boosting model based on pre-trained sentence embeddings reaches an F1 score of 85% in our experimental evaluation. The model can be used to extract comparative sentences for pro/con argumentation in comparative / argument search engines or debating technologies.