To broaden the understanding of sources, pathways and sinks for microplastic pollution in the environment, the exact and representative determination of pollution levels is crucial. Still, sampling techniques differ greatly between studies and the influence of these differences is not fully understood. Thus, we evaluate the representativeness of manta trawling and pump sampling for microplastics in a freshwater lake. While large microplastics are not captured by most pump sampling approaches due to their low abundance, small and fibrous microplastics pass the relatively coarse nets of volume-reduced techniques. Testing different water volumes for pump samples, we show that sample volumes should be large enough to minimize overestimation induced by scaling up results. Moreover, we discuss the influence of sample numbers for microplastic analysis. Finally, we argue that manta trawling and pump sampling are complementary techniques, as they cover different parts of the overall microplastic pollution.
To broaden the understanding of sources, pathways and sinks for microplastic pollution in the environment, the exact and representative determination of pollution levels is crucial. Still, sampling techniques differ greatly between studies and the influence of these differences is not fully understood. Thus, we evaluate the representativeness of manta trawling and pump sampling for microplastics in a freshwater lake. While large microplastics are not captured by most pump sampling approaches due to their low abundance, small and fibrous microplastics pass the relatively coarse nets of volume-reduced techniques. Testing different water volumes for pump samples, we show that sample volumes should be large enough to minimize overestimation induced by scaling up results. Moreover, we discuss the influence of sample numbers for microplastic analysis. Finally, we argue that manta trawling and pump sampling are complementary techniques, as they cover different parts of the overall microplastic pollution.