Why stop at two opinions? Reply to McCrae (2020)

Link:
Autor/in:
Erscheinungsjahr:
2020
Medientyp:
Text
Schlagworte:
  • Personality Development
  • Conscientiousness
  • Neuroses
  • Work
  • Personality
  • Psychology
  • Personality Development
  • Conscientiousness
  • Neuroses
  • Work
  • Personality
  • Psychology
Beschreibung:
  • McCrae (2020) argues that it is premature to explore interventions focused on personality change. In his commentary, he suggests that interventions should be promoted only if their effects in self-report data are confirmed by the additional opinion of informants. We agree with the essence of his position and would go further by envisioning a new framework for rigorous collaborative research on personality change (Bleidorn et al., 2020). We nevertheless maintain that policymakers would benefit from considering the additional opinion of personality scientists.
Lizenz:
  • info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
Quellsystem:
Forschungsinformationssystem der UHH

Interne Metadaten
Quelldatensatz
oai:www.edit.fis.uni-hamburg.de:publications/100c8eea-c32e-47d6-a35d-277bdb171aa8