The effectiveness of health promotion is determined by the foundation of evidence, the targeting of health problems, and the adaptation of interventions to specific social and organizational contexts. Methods for the implementation of these objectives must be able to balance interacting intervention goals, to account for the suitability of interventions for specific target groups and settings, and to integrate complex and divergent data. The core methodology underlying these conditions is peer review assessment. A quality assurance system based on this approach is presented: Two inventories elicit detailed self-descriptions characterizing either actors or activities within health promotion and education. Two assessment instruments instruct experts in reviewing these data according to primary and partial dimensions of quality. Thus, systematically structured and quantifiable quality profiles of organizational units or specific activities are produced. On this basis, comparative indicators for benchmarking purposes can be calculated. Quality profiles containing the strengths and weaknesses of organizations or activities, including indicators, benchmarks, and reviewers' recommendations, are communicated to participating organizations in order to stimulate continuous quality improvement by feedback. Moreover, the system offers a database of comparative indicators for monitoring and optimizing health promotion and education.
The effectiveness of health promotion is determined by the foundation of evidence, the targeting of health problems, and the adaptation of interventions to specific social and organizational contexts. Methods for the implementation of these objectives must be able to balance interacting intervention goals, to account for the suitability of interventions for specific target groups and settings, and to integrate complex and divergent data. The core methodology underlying these conditions is peer review assessment. A quality assurance system based on this approach is presented: Two inventories elicit detailed self-descriptions characterizing either actors or activities within health promotion and education. Two assessment instruments instruct experts in reviewing these data according to primary and partial dimensions of quality. Thus, systematically structured and quantifiable quality profiles of organizational units or specific activities are produced. On this basis, comparative indicators for benchmarking purposes can be calculated. Quality profiles containing the strengths and weaknesses of organizations or activities, including indicators, benchmarks, and reviewers' recommendations, are communicated to participating organizations in order to stimulate continuous quality improvement by feedback. Moreover, the system offers a database of comparative indicators for monitoring and optimizing health promotion and education.