We evaluated the feasibility and toxicity of bevacizumab in combination with sequential high-dose (HD) ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide refractory to standard chemotherapy in patients with sarcoma and germ cell cancer (GCC). Sixteen patients (13 sarcomas, 3 GCC) received SD-ICE followed by 4 cycles of HD-ICE, qd22 with stem cell support in combination with bevacizumab. All 16 patients were evaluable for toxicity and efficacy, and received 51 cycles (median 3.3). There was no increase in toxicity except of a relatively high incidence of ifosfamide encephalopathy in 17 cycles when compared with previous HD-ICE protocols. One almost complete response in the patient with GCC, previously progressive with three preceding protocols, was observed. Six patients had a partial response (sarcoma 4/13 patients; GCC 2/3 patients), and five patients stable disease (sarcoma 5/13 patients). The median PFS/OS for sarcoma was 5 months (confidence interval (CI): 3.1-6.9) and 13 months (CI: 3.6-24.4), respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the addition of bevacizumab to HD-ICE. This combination did not show new unexpected toxicities except for a relatively high rate of ifosfamide encephalopathy. The efficacy in these heavily pretreated patients including possible reversal of chemotherapy resistance by the addition of bevacizumab indicates a possible potential of bevacizumab in this combination.
We evaluated the feasibility and toxicity of bevacizumab in combination with sequential high-dose (HD) ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide refractory to standard chemotherapy in patients with sarcoma and germ cell cancer (GCC). Sixteen patients (13 sarcomas, 3 GCC) received SD-ICE followed by 4 cycles of HD-ICE, qd22 with stem cell support in combination with bevacizumab. All 16 patients were evaluable for toxicity and efficacy, and received 51 cycles (median 3.3). There was no increase in toxicity except of a relatively high incidence of ifosfamide encephalopathy in 17 cycles when compared with previous HD-ICE protocols. One almost complete response in the patient with GCC, previously progressive with three preceding protocols, was observed. Six patients had a partial response (sarcoma 4/13 patients; GCC 2/3 patients), and five patients stable disease (sarcoma 5/13 patients). The median PFS/OS for sarcoma was 5 months (confidence interval (CI): 3.1-6.9) and 13 months (CI: 3.6-24.4), respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the addition of bevacizumab to HD-ICE. This combination did not show new unexpected toxicities except for a relatively high rate of ifosfamide encephalopathy. The efficacy in these heavily pretreated patients including possible reversal of chemotherapy resistance by the addition of bevacizumab indicates a possible potential of bevacizumab in this combination.