Inhibition of the repair of 5-fluorouracil (FU)-induced DNA lesions may improve the response of many tumors to this anticancer agent. Despite the identified associations between DNA strand breaks and the lethality of thymidylate synthase inhibitors, the role of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways in a cellular response to 5-FU treatment has not been studied yet. Isogenic cell lines defective (irs1SF), wild type (AA8), or reconstituted (1SFK8) in the DSB repair protein XRCC3 were used to investigate the effect of defective DSB repair on the overall sensitivity of cells to 5-FU and to see how targeting DSB repair may affect other cellular responses to 5-FU. Treatment with 5-FU resulted in (i) similar induction of DSB in both cell lines as indicated by the formation of gamma-H2AX (a marker for DSB). The repair of these breaks was complete in AA8 but not in irs1SF cells. (ii) Concentration-dependent reduction in the survival of both cell lines. The AA8 cells were six times more sensitive to 5-FU than the irs1SF cells. (iii) An earlier and more prolonged G(1)/S phase arrest in AA8 compared with the irs1SF cells. (iv) Induction of apoptosis as indicated by sub-G(1) cells and caspase-3 activity in AA8 but not in irs1SF cells. XRCC3 complementation of irs1SF cells restored the wild-type phenotype. This result shows that targeting DSB repair is not always associated with increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents such as 5-FU because it may affect other cellular responses such as cell cycle regulation and induction of apoptosis.
Inhibition of the repair of 5-fluorouracil (FU)-induced DNA lesions may improve the response of many tumors to this anticancer agent. Despite the identified associations between DNA strand breaks and the lethality of thymidylate synthase inhibitors, the role of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways in a cellular response to 5-FU treatment has not been studied yet. Isogenic cell lines defective (irs1SF), wild type (AA8), or reconstituted (1SFK8) in the DSB repair protein XRCC3 were used to investigate the effect of defective DSB repair on the overall sensitivity of cells to 5-FU and to see how targeting DSB repair may affect other cellular responses to 5-FU. Treatment with 5-FU resulted in (i) similar induction of DSB in both cell lines as indicated by the formation of gamma-H2AX (a marker for DSB). The repair of these breaks was complete in AA8 but not in irs1SF cells. (ii) Concentration-dependent reduction in the survival of both cell lines. The AA8 cells were six times more sensitive to 5-FU than the irs1SF cells. (iii) An earlier and more prolonged G(1)/S phase arrest in AA8 compared with the irs1SF cells. (iv) Induction of apoptosis as indicated by sub-G(1) cells and caspase-3 activity in AA8 but not in irs1SF cells. XRCC3 complementation of irs1SF cells restored the wild-type phenotype. This result shows that targeting DSB repair is not always associated with increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents such as 5-FU because it may affect other cellular responses such as cell cycle regulation and induction of apoptosis.